Explosive Reveal’Democrats Share Letter Allegedly Signed by Trump to Sex Offender Epstein

1. A Shocking Release from Congress

On September 8–9, 2025, Democrats on the House Oversight Committee unveiled a startling document: a sexually suggestive birthday letter, allegedly written and signed by Donald Trump and addressed to Jeffrey Epstein in 2003, well before Epstein’s abuse allegations became public . The letter, part of a “birthday book” compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell for Epstein’s 50th birthday, is framed by a crude drawing—an outline resembling a nude woman’s silhouette.

At the top of the crude sketch, the letter begins with imagined dialogue: Trump saying, “A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday – and may every day be another wonderful secret.” The text is typed within the outline of the nude image, with a signature beneath it sketched in a marker-like style.

2. Context: The Epstein Book and Its Significance

The letter emerged from a 2003 “birthday book” compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell, containing messages from high-profile acquaintances. Alongside Trump, contributors allegedly included Bill Clinton and attorney Alan Dershowitz.

This collection surfaced as part of congressional efforts to examine Epstein’s network and actions. The Oversight Committee subpoenaed Epstein’s estate, receiving hundreds of pages of documents, including the birthday book, contact books, financial records, legal agreements, and more.

3. Trump’s Forceful Denials and Legal Response

The White House and the Trump team immediately rejected the letter’s authenticity, characterizing it as a fabrication. Deputy Chief of Staff Taylor Budowich posted side-by-side images of known Trump signatures, asserting confidently: “it’s not his signature. DEFAMATION!”.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt reiterated, “These are not my words, … I don’t draw pictures,” claiming the letter’s language and illustration are inconsistent with Trump’s style .

Beyond words, Trump pursued legal action. He filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal and its parent News Corp, which initially reported on the letter in July—claiming the story was “false, malicious, and defamatory”.

4. Political Fallout and Broader Reactions

4.1 Congressional and Political Commentary

• Republican responses to the release were mixed. Some derided it as politically motivated. Rep. Byron Donalds remarked, “It’s not his signature. I’ve seen Donald Trump sign a million things.” Rep. Thomas Massie downplayed its relevance to Epstein victims, stating, “Having a birthday card from Trump doesn’t help the survivors.”.
• In contrast, Democrats seized on the note as emblematic of a deeper lack of transparency. They pressed, “What is he hiding? Release the files!”.

4.2 Public and Media Impact

The release quickly became a trending online story, with social media dominated by speculation about the phrase “wonderful secret”. Major outlets such as Reuters, AP, PBS, Le Monde, and The Guardian covered the story comprehensively, noting the political, legal, and reputational stakes for Trump.

5. Historical Context: Trump and Epstein’s Past

Trump and Epstein’s relationship is well-documented. They were seen together frequently in the 1990s and early 2000s, attended social events, and had ties through Mar-a-Lago and mutual friends. Trump once complimented Epstein as “terrific guy” and “a lot of fun to be with,” though later claimed Epstein “stole” young women from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago staff, leading to their falling out.

Notably, in 2003—when the letter was dated—Trump and Epstein were still within a social circle that included elite gatherings, parties, and informal exchanges .

6. Implications of the Letter’s Release

6.1 For Accountability and Transparency

The disclosure reignited demands for full access to the Epstein files. Victims’ advocates and lawmakers argue that transparency is essential—especially given past non-prosecution agreements and incomplete disclosures.

6.2 For Trump’s Legal and Political Future

The defamation suit places the WSJ and News Corp at the center of a high-stakes legal battle. The authenticity of the letter—and whether Trump’s signature is verifiable—will likely become key evidentiary points.

Politically, the release may impact Trump’s image. While longtime supporters may dismiss it, opponents could leverage the suggestive nature and timing—just ahead of electoral cycles—as evidence of moral impropriety.

6.3 For Media Reporting

The pen-and-drawn nature of the message, combined with the stylized signature, raises questions about journalistic standards in confirming documents. WSJ’s willingness to report on July’s leak—followed by congressional confirmation—illustrates the complexity of sourcing and verifying sensitive materials.

7. What Comes Next?

• Legal proceedings: Trump’s lawsuit will probably hinge on expert handwriting and signature analysis. Courts may be asked to determine authenticity.
• Congressional action: The Oversight Committee may push for further subpoenas, public hearings, or release of remaining documents.
• Public opinion: If the letter’s authenticity is confirmed, it could tarnish Trump’s image. If disproven, concerns about political manipulation could arise on both sides.